Press Release:
Elexana LLC Sham EMF Testing Terrorizes New York Chelsea Home Family Forcing Owners to Vacate
Your Consumer Protection Advocate YCPA© Reports Court Ruling in EMF Case in New York City that terrified a home owner when there was no risk.
EMF Testing and 4-5G WIFI Smart Meter Emission Power Lines Cell Towers have garnered much attention in recent years with many having a high interest in safety seeking licensed experts to conduct studies for health and safety.
The consumer needs be aware there
have been rashes of overnight EMF certificates issued to anyone without any state
or industry licensed for electrical services by self-appointed unrecognized
"academies" that have no legal, academic or scientific authority.
Without license such are not permitted to touch, measure, make changes,
repairs, corrections, electronic services and other activity to perform such or make any health and safety claims.
The Hartman Case
A recent New York City published legal case Decided Mar 31, 2021 in Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County, Hartman v. WVH HDFC, 71 Misc. 3d 1204 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 2021), 2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 50276 , 142 N.Y.S.3d 79 that was recently by reviewed YCPA and interview with the NYC licensed expert (scientist from electraEMF - SpectralAnalyticalSciences.com ) that was involved in dismissing the report from certificate holder Jim Finn (JF) from a recent upstart company
calling itself Elexana LLC.
In this case the individual JF instantly proclaimed claimed to be a licensed electronics engineer expert with numerous qualifications such as radio license, medical authority, patents, being a major scientist with IEEE, and other such information on their website cleverly convinced
architects, engineers and attorneys of his authority when in fact he had only just recently
obtained a building bio type overnight certificate that is given to anyone for a fee.
Elexana in their report made claims that the readings they collected were of a dangerous level to human health and that expensive shields were required and work must be performed.
The property owners in HARTMAN being the plaintiff/petitioner filed claims against the management company WVH HDFC the defendant/respondent then retained NYC attorney Jared Langenthal Esq. that subsequently obtained the services of a medically integrated scientist Dr. J. Dumanov of Spectral Analytical Sciences, a legal court certified expert witness, state and industry licensed electronics and communication engineer (NYC RCA Institute and Sarnoff Electronics and Communications Labs, Princeton NJ) and technologist (electraEMF.com) to review the building bio report that then conducted a clinical technical environmental study of the property in this matter. The property was identified with no levels of EMF that were of clinical - medical interest or concern. The court in closing this case ruled the EMF claims by Elexana LLC were unsupported and dismissed the petitioner/plaintiff's report for being without expert standing for their claim.
In a YCPA interview after the case was dismissed with American scientist prof. dr. J. Dumanov, reported in court record as having performed over 2,500 studies in a 20 year period, a peer review associate editor for over 200 scientific, publications we asked the following questions about the case and how the consumer is to protect themselves from what legally is considered theft by deception as such what is considered unqualified activity from building bio certificate types that have been causing alarm, devaluing properties, frightening property owners and at the same time they are clearly overlooking, not recognizing true areas of exposure risk from elements of the electro magnetic spectrum when such is present.
Q. How was the EMF exposure study conducted for safety of the property at the request of the attorney for the defendant/respondent for this EMF legal case approached?
A. Surprisingly this is the second time that I came to the aid of a victim of Elexana's report that terrorized a young mother in Hoboken previously reported by YCPA.
It must be understood that for EMF ELF RFR 2-3-4-5G exposure for risk and health are all highly technical - clinical scientific studies. For such, initially we conducted our own fully integrated multivariate electromagnetic spectrum study that was performed for clinical-medical, health and safety purposes. We then reviewed the petitioner/plaintiff's so-called building bio report.
Q. How do you determine safe levels for EMF levels as in this study for this case?
A. Having reviewed countless studies over decades and from experience the levels identified were of no clinical-medical potential risk for all areas of interest for the health and safety of the family.
Q. What did your review of the plaintiff's/petitioner's building bio report in terms of EMF risk exposure.
A. Having prepublication review of EMF risks exposure for major scientific publications in oncology, toxicology, immunology, medical mycology and EMF publications and journals I was very disappointed that occupants in this case were distressed on what was based upon being no relevant science, and conducted by deceptive amateurs' and unnecessarily distressing the owner occupants based upon numbers reported that had no peer reviewed scientific basis.
Q. What are the qualifications necessary for conducting EMF testing for exposure studies.
A. From the start for the technical environmental there must be rigorous state and industry required professional accredited academics, internship, experience that is fully recognized by state and industry to provide lawful licensing authority.
Q. What are the building bio type EMF certificates all about?
A. These building bio startups recognizing our pioneering research began calling me over 15 years ago wanting to know about how this practice is conducted and began to copy and mimic our early websites. Such all was done by Elexana when it frost began pretending to be possible clients and patients.
In fact they asked to teach them and I mentioned the requirements and then not having heard from them again. Then their sites appeared in the US in California and Arizona and other locations and then began to issuing certificates by unaccredited international websites in Canada, and the EU . These certificate reports are considered sham reports that are not recognized lawfully as in the Hartman case that merely cite EMF unrelated and irrelevant numbers without any supporting bona fide science.
It is clear those that are creating such reports and issuing these EMF certificates must be held accountable with lawsuits for the harm they create to you the public due to misinformation, disinformation, misconceptions and unrelated information they pass off as science that is not relevant that causes such harm to those affected from such sham reporting.
Q. Are such report numbers important? What are EMF testing safe numbers and levels?
A. EMF safe numbers, numbers, numbers. Numbers have many limitations that are unrecognized. This is an area where there is a problem for many reasons that include instrumentation issues, measuring issues, methodology and interpterion of the readings. The numbers by amateurs' are not qualifed for the most important clinical medical diagnostic requirements to start, then technically are not understood and thereby not for any professional critical clinical-medical for the diagnosis and contractual purposes where safety is an interest and concern.
Q. What are the requirements to conduct EMF testing for health and safety.
A. That is an interesting but is in fact a binary question that have separate sets for computation of the highest order. Epidemiologists recognize that related health and safety testing are separate paradigms and domains due to environmental and the clinical-medical setting for our in situ EMF exposure studies for such for our reporting.
Q. How do you diagnose and determine the effects of EMF fields?
A. Given decades of work with over 8,000 cases in related clinical molecular epidemiology, oncology, immunology, toxicology and related for the diagnostic integrations typically review medical reports from our clients and patients. For the diagnostics for such matters the mandatory applied integrated clinical-medical differentials, and relevant emissions and field levels are evaluated and considered for the exposure testing is beyond the meter readings.
Q. Why after many years of research is there no conclusive research that fully outlines the health effects of EMF on people?
A. For our studies and reporting our work is scientifically conclusive on a case by case basis as acknowledged in the Harman case but also in a case against Verizon in Princeton NJ involving a communications installation exposing a family to emissions. In this case, Verizon after our report was submitted there were multiple interrogatories and depositions by their Philadelphia law firm and subsequently Verizon settled acknowledging my study methodology and report.
Q. What is the real science behind EMF related exposure?
A. This will be the closing answer for this question for the day coming from the inside. Some know of my work while in Milan during the outbreak of COVID 19 and our publication at that time. I and our scientific team knew all about CV19 from day one. There are three domains encountered being of true science (non-Fauci), economic marketing and the political involved. Being in science and not the latter two. For all the good, trusting and intelligent people what you are reading is not real science, but political economic marketing (PEM) that produces clearly misleading and intentionally confusing publications. Why, because is is not original but parroted, innuendo and hearsay. Scientific publications are rigorously reviewed contain the real science between the lines of true research/testing. If one can not see or read between the lines one is left with the headlines only.
What you are reading about EMF 4-5 G is trivial, inapplicable, and clearly without scientific basis and is legally to be dismissed but yet impressive to even the most learned.
The expecting, those with infants and children are most vulnerable. Many of my clients are MD and post doc recognizing my integrated practice, and yes our studies have turned their and many other lives around.
Q. Thank you for your time. Your work is most impressive with your clinical, medical, electronics and legal background. Any closing recommendations ?
A. Do not be deceived under any circumstances and know the bio certificate holders that have LLC certificates (Limited Liability Corporation) believing they can deliver incompetent services such as reported with Elexana LLC that have deceived architects, engineers and attorneys believing they are without liability are in for a surprise not knowing there is no LLC protection for the deceptive services, malpractice, malfeasance, nonfeasance, and negligence for this critical practice. Understand that it was not easy to win a case against a 160 billion dollar Verizon company, yet I knew from the start my client plaintiff would prevail form my experience in my own over 100 clinical environmental legal cases.
The science is clear as to the effects of the EMF spectrum and it is not what you are reading on the building bio sites-it is simply not true science but "Faucism". In closing, for anyone that has suffered from any resulting pecuniary loss or personal injury resulting in the failure to identify exposure risk may seek an action in tort , personal harm or for the defamation of their property resulting in loss of value, related contractual interference or other actions or otherwise harmed may call for a free consultation to possibly retain our forensic services for such matters. As a published civil rights advocate, and for NJ NY CT PA and court certified for child protection services (CASA) have been here to protect the public for decades. Thank so you very much for your time Dr. Dumanov
For YCPA© Interview: Claire Marie De Champ, Esq.
For NY Victims of Consumer Fraud and Deception Call
For New Jersey Victims of Consumer Fraud and Deception Call
